Should :page be a required parameter?
Reported by Chris Wanstrath | June 21st, 2007 @ 06:33 AM
Is there ever a case where you would call paginate without :page? If not, I say we raise an exception if you don't include it. Too many people getting tripped up.
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
Chris Wanstrath June 21st, 2007 @ 06:33 AM
- State changed from “open” to “resolved”
(from [272]) Will Paginate: the ":page" option is now required for all paginating finders!! Its value can still be nil (it defaults to 1), but its presence is required or an ArgumentError is raised. This is because people forget to write ":page => params[:page]" in their controllers when calling paginating finders, so they get confused why are they stuck on the same page all the time. [#38 state:resolved]
Please Sign in or create a free account to add a new ticket.
With your very own profile, you can contribute to projects, track your activity, watch tickets, receive and update tickets through your email and much more.
Create new ticket
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile ยป
Everyone's favorite Ruby library for pagination of practically anything!
People watching this ticket
- Nobody is watching this ticket.